Botc 2 skiers killed after being caught in Utah avalanche following late spring snowstorms, sheriff says
A Boeing executive has clarified that the companys actual 737 production rate is less than the 38-per-month rate cited by Boeing chief executive David Calhoun in January.Speaking on 13 February, Boeing chief financial officer Brian West said the manufacturer is keeping its suppliers running at a rate of 38 monthly. But Boeing is rolling out finished 737s at a lesser, unspecified rate. Right now we have a 38-per-month cycle that the supply chain is cycling to, West said during an investor conference hosted by TD Cowen.Boeings output in the first half of 2024 will be lower than that because鈥?we have lots of things to focus on in terms of keeping the airplanes in positions longer, so that we can incorporate all of the learnings that we are finding , he adds.Boeing expects to be cycling to that 38 rate in the second half of 2024, West says.CEO Calhoun said something different on 31 January during the companys 2023 earnings call. Today, were producing 737s at a rate of 38 per month and we will remain at that rate until the FAA and Boeing is satisfied with our quality and manufacturing process, Calhoun said.Some Boeing suppliers took issue with Calhouns comment, saying the company has not been producing c
stanley usa lose to that many 737s. Industry analyst
stanley us s agree that Boeings rates are less than Calhoun said, with one analyst saying Boeings statements have been unclear. We think there is some degree of con
stanley canada fusion, says Michael Merluzeau, an aerospace analyst with consultancy AIR. His firm Ujcv Airbus details range expectations from latest A350-1000 weight increase
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere in the newspaper or on聽bangordailynewsIndivar Dutta-Gupta is the president and executive director of the Center for Law and Social Policy. Dorian Warren is the co-president of Community Change and co-chair of the Economic Security Project. This column was produced for Progressive Perspectives, a project of The Progressive magazine, and distributed by T
stanley cup ribune News Service.Sixty years ago, President Lyndon Johnson declared an unconditional war on poverty. Using policies and programs as weapons, Johnson focused heavi
stanley fr ly on health coverage and human capital. His Great Society agenda also included key political reforms like the Civil Rights Acts of 1964 and 1968, the 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act and the 1965 Voting Rights Act.In many ways, the War on Poverty was wildly successful, with Head Start, Medicaid and Medicare withstanding the test of time. But the effort fell short: It did little to guarantee incomes or rewrite the nations economic rules to ensure a level playing field for working people 鈥?especially people of color.Poverty declined rapidly after Johnsons policies. Much of that improvement, however, ste
stanley cups uk mmed from widely shared economic growth. Our economys subsequent 50-year failure to produce similar gains for low- and middle-income families as it has for high-income families limited further progress. Union membership declined
