Udzl Door drops off Boeing 767, rattles Seattle suburb
WASHINGTON How much are your private conversations worth to the U.S. government Turns out, it can be a lot, depending on the technology.In the era of intense government surveillance and secret court orders, a murky multimillion-dollar market has emerged. Paid for by U.S. tax dollars, but with little public scrutiny, surveillance fees charged in secret by technology and phone companies can vary wildly.ATT, for example, imposes a $325 activation fee for each wiretap and $10 a day to maintain it. Smaller carriers Cricket and U.S. Cellular charge only about $250 per wiretap. But snoop on a Verizon customer That costs the government $775 for the first month and $500 each month after that, according to industry disclosures made last year to Congressman Edward Markey. Meanwhile, email records like those amassed by t
stanley cup spain he National Security Agency through a program revealed by former NSA systems analyst Edward Snowden probably were collected for free or very
stanley cup cheaply. Facebook says it doesn t charge the government for access. And while Microsoft, Yahoo and Google won t say how much they charge, the American Civil Liberties Union found that email records can be turned over for as little as $25. CBS Industry says it doesn t profit from the hundreds of thousands of government eavesdropping requests it receives each year, and civil liberties groups want businesses to
stanley cup charge. They worry that gover Fwqa A Squirt of Flame Forms a Fiery Jellyfish in Microgravity
Behavioral psychologists have known for quite some time that people are more likely to harm others when they ;re part of a g
stanley website roup. A new study suggests that mob mentality happens when we stop reflecting on our own personal moral standards. People become more hostile when there an us and them ; scenario. Individuals in groups often exhibit behaviors that are contrary to their private moral standards. Studies have shown that, when people are in a group, they feel more anonymous, and that they ;re less likely to be caught. They also feel less accountable for a
stanley mugg collective action. But a new study by Mina Cikara and Rebecca Saxe offers a third factor: The suggestion that people in groups lose touch with their own morals and beliefs and become more likely to do things they would normally believe are wrong. Anne Trafton from MIT New Of
vaso stanley fice explains: In a study that recently went online in the journal NeuroImage, the researchers measured brain activity in a part of the brain involved in thinking about oneself. They found that in some people, this activity was reduced when the subjects participated in a competition as part of a group, compared with when they competed as individuals. Those people were more likely to harm their competitors than people who did not exhibit this decreased brain activity. This process alone does not account for intergroup conflict: Groups also promote anonymity, diminish personal responsibility, and enco
