Rfzw Shooting Challenge: HDR Photography
As they look for a college admissions edge, soon-to-be high school juniors face a unique dilemma: Should they take the old SAT in the fall, or wait for the new version, with a timed essay, in the spring of 2005 It s a question that applies mainly to the high school of class of 2006, whose leap into the college admissions fray coincides with the transition to the new SAT. For some students, it s adding an extra dose of stress and strategizing to an already complex process.And
stanley cup it isn t helping that the two major test prep companies are split on whether taking the old SAT next fall is a good idea. It s just raised the fear leve
stanley website l tremendously, said Patrick Smith, director of communications and customer services for undergraduate admissions in the Penn State University system.Why bother to take the old test when most colleges are focused on the new one Some students think they might do better on the old version, which 1.4 million students took at least once last year. The new test replaces quantitative comparisons and verbal analogies the old clay is to potter as stone is to sculptor questions with more reading comprehension and advanced math, as well as the essay.Some colleges, like those in the University of California system, say they will look only at scores from the new SAT or the ACT, which also has a new, optional writing component .But others are handling the transition year d
stanley mug ifferently. More than 80 percent of schools that responded to a recent survey by tes Zoyu This lovely Lego Barad-d没r actually lights up
The writers at Nature News recently put together a list of the 100 most highly cited papers of all time. There are a few sur
stanley bottles prises in here, including the fact that it takes no fewer than 12,119 citations to rank in the top 100. The list, which was created by pulling dat
stanley cup a from the Science Citation Index SCI , spans the last 100 years of scholarly publications. The sheer size of the literature 鈥?58 million items 鈥?shows that the top 100 papers are true outliers; just three publications have more than 100,000 citations. Many of the world most famous and influential papers didn ;t even make the cut. To help put it all into perspective, Nature News put together a video above and this infographic click to embiggen . If the cumulative stack of all these papers were scaled to the size of Mount Kilimanjaro, then the 100 most-cited papers would represent just one centimeter at the peak. Only 14,499 papers 鈥?about a meter and a half worth 鈥?have more than 1,000 citations. Roughly half of the items have only one citation. So what the most cited paper of all time That distinction goes to a 1951 paper by U.S. biochemist Oliver Lowry and colleagues describing an assay to determine the amount of protein in a solution. To date, it has collect more than 305,000 citations. And no one entirely sure why 8230; Here are the top five: Sexy, right Shockingly, Watson and Crick paper on the structure of
stanley termosar DNA missed out just 5,207 citations 8230;what!
